The reason for the stop
An officer needs reasonable suspicion to stop you at all. Weaving within a lane, a brief touch of the
fog line, or an anonymous tip without corroboration frequently will not support one. If the stop was
unlawful, everything after it — the tests, the statements, the breath or blood result — is subject to
suppression, and the case usually ends.
Field sobriety testing
The three standardized tests have published administration and scoring procedures, and their claimed
accuracy depends entirely on following them. Officers routinely deviate. They are also validated on a
narrow population — age, weight, injuries, footwear, roadside conditions, and medical issues all affect
performance in ways that have nothing to do with alcohol.
Breath test reliability
The instrument requires documented maintenance, calibration, and a properly observed waiting period.
Mouth alcohol, GERD and acid reflux, dental work, diabetes and ketosis, and even certain workplace
chemical exposures can distort a result. Maintenance records are obtainable, and they are not always
clean.
Blood draws and warrants
A blood draw generally requires a warrant or valid consent. The affidavit supporting that warrant can be
attacked, and so can the draw itself: who performed it, whether the correct tubes and preservatives were
used, how the sample was stored, whether fermentation or clotting occurred, and whether the chain of
custody is complete.
Retrograde extrapolation
The legal question is your alcohol concentration at the time of driving, not at the time of
testing an hour or more later. If you were still absorbing, your BAC at the wheel may have been below
the limit. The State's extrapolation requires assumptions about drinking pattern, food, and elimination
rate that are frequently unsupported by any actual evidence.
"Operating" and the driving element
The State must prove you operated the vehicle while intoxicated. Cases involving someone found parked,
asleep in a vehicle, or at the scene after the fact often have real proof problems on both the operation
element and the timing of intoxication.
The video
Dashcam and bodycam footage frequently contradicts the offense report. Clear speech, steady walking, and
normal responses on video are powerful against a narrative of slurred speech and unsteady balance —
which is why obtaining and reviewing every second of footage matters.
Prior convictions used to enhance
Where the State alleges priors to make a case a Class A or a felony, those judgments must be properly
proved and linked to you. Defective prior judgments, uncounseled pleas, and identity problems are real,
and defeating an enhancement can move a case from a felony back to a misdemeanor.